ext4 was supposed to be a stop gap until a better Linux filesystem came along. With not having the time to conduct the usual kernel version vs. XFS is better larger files and long-term maintaince and stability. I've been running btrfs quite a while now, with one filesystem crash after a power failure. The major difference between ext4 and XFS file systems is that the ext4 file system works better for fewer size files (single write/read thread) while the XFS works more efficiently. When space gets low, Btrfs automatically expands the volume in chunks of roughly 1 GB. 另外，我们常说的file对象，它用于关联进程和dentry对象的. This allows you to do an in-place conversion of unmounted (offline) file systems,. Does that mean that if I'm using btrfs snapshots, it will not save parity data for any snapshots other than the current state of the drive, that it will only save parity data for one snapshot other than the current state of the drive, or that it will fail entirely?Generally, would go with btrfs. ZFS, the Zettabyte file system, was developed as part of the Solaris operating system created by Sun Microsystems. I remember being on ext4 using Timeshift but it only supports rsync–so slow. The benchmark I linked attributes this to copy-on-write behaviour of btrfs. Edit: fsdump / fsrestore means the corresponding system backup and restore to for that file system. Log in • Sign up. . Linux 5. For more than 3 disks, or a spinning disk with ssd, zfs starts to look very interesting. all kinds for nice features (like extents, subsecond timestamps) which ext3 does not have. ext4 ファイルシステムは、2 32 個を超える inode をサポートしません。 XFS は inode を動的に割り当てます。It provides a basic Unix- like file system for Linux, using virtual directories to handle physical devices, and storing data in fixed-length blocks on the physical devices. I'ved tested compress=off/lz4, dedup=on/off and serveral Cache/Log constellations on 256GB SSD. If not, stick with EXT4, or other more 'classic' solutions. 4 HDD RAID performance per his request with Btrfs, EXT4, and XFS while using consumer HDDs and an AMD Ryzen APU setup that could work out for a NAS type low-power system for anyone else that may be interested. The Slant team built an AI & it’s awesome Find the best product instantly. (當然另一種做法是新增硬碟, 另外格式化為 btrfs. Because of that, the Ext4 file system is very stable. Now, lot of development efforts are pushed to Btrfs development and most probably it will become next generation default FS for Linux, a successor of EXT4. We believe that btrfs has the correct feature set and roadmap to serve Ceph in the long-term, but XFS and ext4. • 3 mo. ZFS on FreeBSD may be faster than BTRFS on Linux. 6 Comments With FS-Mark there was a very noticeable drop with the XFS file-system with KPTI and Retpoline enabled while EXT4 saw the second largest drop while Btrfs and. This is the most desired feature of Btrfs. - Linux Kernel 5. It has features that can scale better than ext4 and is even preferred over ZFS by some users. xfs command. My current setup is /@ for the rootfs, /@home for home dir, works great. 0, XFS is the default file system instead of ext4. BTRFS is good for rotational drives too, but it's still not fully mature and I'm hesitant to recommend it because of previous issues with data. webbphillips • 8 mo. And BRTFS has some really nice features in that area. Till the moment, the ext4 seems to be a better choice on the desktop system since it is. But shrinking is no problem for ext4 or btrfs. showed that at the time the performance for the RAID setup was not able to compete with ext4 and ZFS. Thanks. /etc/fstab /dev/sda5 / ext4 defaults,noatime 0 1 Doing so breaks applications that rely on access time, see fstab#atime options for possible solutions. Si su aplicación falla con números de inodo grandes, monte el sistema de archivos XFS con la opción -o inode32 para imponer números de inodo inferiores a 232. We currently recommend XFS for production deployments. Yes, both BTRFS and ZFS have advanced features that are missing in EXT4. That being said, it is meant as a temporary solution to migrate data to a native Unix file system, such as ZFS or UFS. It's the fastest option bar none if you have enough RAM. List of archive formats. The NTFS support was powered by FUSE. We will determine which one is the best ZFS, BTRFS, and EXT4. It's a 64-bit, journaling filesystem that has been built into the Linux kernel since 2001 and offers high performance for large filesystems and high degrees of concurrency (i. EXT4 VS BTRFS. For example it's xfsdump/xfsrestore for xfs, dump/restore for ext2/3/4. Die Benchmark-Testergebnisse zeigten, dass BTRFS etwas niedrigere Lese- und Schreibgeschwindigkeiten als EXT4 hatte. If you are looking for advanced features such as data checksumming, snapshots, and data deduplication, then Btrfs may be the better option. Otherwise it's sort of figuring out what features you want to drop. Example: Dropbox is hard-coded to use ext4, so will refuse to work on ZFS and BTRFS. 0 SSD drive used was a 250GB Samsung 850 PRO solid-state drive connected both. The BTRFS RAID is not difficult at all to create or problematic, but up until now, OMV does not support BTRFS RAID creation or management through the webGUI, so you have to use the terminal. BTRFS hatte auch etwas höhere Latenz als EXT4, was bedeutet, dass es länger dauerte, bis Dateien auf dem Dateisystem zugegriffen werden konnten. I think you can trust XFS. You didn't provide the Linux distribution information, but assuming CentOS or Red Hat, XFS is now somewhat integrated. Even if you don’t get the advantages that come from multi-disk systems, you do get the luxury of ZFS snapshots and replication. For a single disk, both are good options. Usable space isn't a big issue but I don't want to lose half with RAID 10. Its not faster or more stable then the other two. Used with LVM; ext4 is complimented with things like Extending volumes. Both btrfs and zfs feel like the worst options considering their overhead. wbeater • 3 yr. This is equivalent to specifying -m single on the command. XFS is Red Hat’s enterprise filesystem (until they finally trust btrfs). 6：顺序. Linux File System Comparison: XFS vs. Yeah I think EXT4 and BTRFS are the way to go for everyone, unless you have specific other needs. It supports all. BtrFS looked promising, but last I checked it still couldn't be trusted in RAID modes. g. EXT4 had the best speed at 58MB/s while Btrfs came in slightly behind that at 52MB/s and then ZFS came in at 46MB/s. The ext file-system uses a system called inodes to track information about the files stored in the virtual directory. 0 File-System. Stratis is no where near ready for version 1. org's git. Btrfs is the recommended file system to use in most scenarios. Then later, I was actually able to convert that from btrfs-raid10. It's not the fastest but not exactly a slouch. 여러 가지의 HDD를 장착하여 사용을 하신다면 사진이나 중요한 자료들을 저장하는 드라이브에는. @taffer Your "recent benchmark" is from April 2015, over three years old and uses XFS with only default options. If you don't need the features of btrfs, then stick to ext4. Con: rumor has it that it is slower than ext3, the fsync dataloss soap. ZFS can also send and receive file system snapshots, a process which allows users to optimize their disk space. - chống phân mảnh dữ liệu nhanh chóng. 4TB HDD formatted as NTFS for backuping all other three hard disks. The two primary reasons I use btrfs are easy to setup and maintain RAID arrays, and. btrfs/ext4 volume on top of a ZFS zvol. Not a ton of bells and whistles, but they Just Work. For zfs there is a plugin. . BTRFS's problems are exaggerated, and depending on your use case may fit better than ZFS. Till the moment, the ext4 seems to be a better choice on the desktop system since it is presented as a default file system, as well as it is faster than the btrfs when transferring files. ext4 is an "advanced" version of ext3 with various improvements, basically an upgrade to the ext3 format. However, to be honest, it’s not the best Linux file system comparing to other Linux file systems. We may have lengthy talk on ext vs XFS vs f2fs and btrfs vs zfs and there are many more points to be mentioned, but for regular users. All my systems (4) have been using BTRFS for some time now without any issues. But still iffy on high raid levels. Another way to characterize this is that the Ext4 file system variants tend to perform better on systems that have limited I/O capability. It uses a default file system for Linux distribution, including Debian and Ubuntu. However ZFS does come at one major downside, it needs more resources in just about every way one can imagine, ZFS is best with more disks, more RAM, more CPU, more Bandwidth, more SSD’s for caching…. 2. Both file systems can recover from a power loss, but using Btrfs will not immunize you from them. could go with btrfs even though it's still in beta and not recommended for production yet. Ext4 and XFS are both great for "I need a filesystem, to store files, on this drive". Ext4 tiene el registro en diario de forma predeterminada y es probable que los nuevos usuarios no sepan cómo deshabilitarlo para guardar lecturas / escrituras en sus. XFS vs. If you wish to run ext4, xfs or btrfs then you need to run a linux OS not BSD. Per the recommendation from RedHat: Another way to characterize this is that the Ext4 file system variants tend to perform better on systems that have limited I/O capability. Running AIO-Stress on the Western Digital VelociRaptor was yielding speeds not technically possible for the Serial ATA 3. Learn how to compare btrfs with other file systems like ZFS, ext4, or XFS in terms of features, benefits, and drawbacks. Perhaps btrfs is much better for SSDs, but in oldschool HDDs I. See moreA number of Phoronix readers have been asking about some fresh file-system comparisons on recent kernels. Resizing (growing) is possible with btrfs and xfs. Zu diesen gehören eine integrierte RAID-Funktionalität, ein inkludierter Volume Manager und die Unterstützung von Dateisystemen bis 16EiB. However, when we review EXT4 vs BTRFS, here’s the downside: BTRFS has disk and volume management built-in, while EXT4 is a “pure filesystem”. 5. 对于一些文件系统如Ext4等，在硬盘格式化时就全部确定了，而对于XFS则是动态生成的，BtrfS则是更特别的动态实现。. 6. 21 merge window (now known as Linux 5. Probably those edge cases are not visible on an external USB hard drive, could be visible with external SSDs on a USB3. Red Hat Training. XFS as a similar featureset filesystem manages around 99. BTRFS bietet, mal abgesehen von der Möglichkeit einer Inline Deduplizierung, beinahe alle Features von ZFS. Ext4 Ext4 is another filesystem that has support for SSD. Plus, XFS is baked in with most Linux distributions so you get that added bonus To answer your question, however, if ext4 and btrfs were the only two filesystems, I would choose ext4 because btrfs has been making headlines about courrpting people's data and I've used ext4 with no issue. So for a large video collection, I think I will stick with ext4 still. But timeshift reports (maybe due to different sizes of the combined btrfs) as reported in my initial. g. Ext4 is more mature, whereas Btrfs has features that should allow for greater resilience (and, in theory, should make it less susceptible to data corruption). Try it now. A File system is one of the most important aspects that af. Notes[ edit] ^ IBM introduced JFS with the initial release of AIX OS/2 Warp. To recommend a suitable file system, I need to know the exact purpose of /tmp. 4 EXT4 / XFS / Btrfs RAID Performance On Four HDDs Storage : 2019-12-28: Benchmarking The Experimental Bcachefs File-System Against Btrfs, EXT4, F2FS, XFS & ZFS Storage : 2019-06-25: Optane SSD RAID Performance With ZFS On Linux, EXT4, XFS, Btrfs, F2FS Storage : 2019-06-20: Linux 5. Both ext4 and XFS should be able to handle it. EXT4 has been the Linux default since 2006, following the previous EXT3. Depending on why you want btrfs, you could run zfs. Btrfs, ZFS, and bcachefs are probably your best bets out of the 19 options considered. That XFS performs best on fast storage and better hardware allowing more parallelism was my conclusion too. For example, my virtualization server is currently hyper-v and I use ReFS instead of NTFS for features like bitrot protection, checksums, ect. BTRFS have some fancy features, and could help you manage your disk better in some automation-future-proof way. 1. If you don't need consistency supported by a filesystem, you can use ext4 with journal option off, F2FS (when a program that use /tmp. スナップショットの取得機能LVMで搭載されてた増分、差分のバックアップ機能ext3,ext4からbtrfsへの変換と逆変換機能SSDへの最適化RAID機能（今まではmd mdadmなどのデバイスマッパーでしか出来な. Using multiple drives of varying sizes created a luks1 encrypted ‘single’ data and dup meta volume. - Btrfs hỗ trợ tính năng pool trên ổ cứng. That was many years ago, perhaps when btrfs was less ready. It's a filesystem which resides entirely in your RAM. Here is a quote from RHEL regarding XFS vs ext4. After much reading on ReFS, Btrfs, & ZFS, I've decided to run all 3 🤷♂️(Did the same with Seagate vs. My home file share runs zol because I prefer zfs to btrfs and run it at work a lot so I'm much more comfortable with it. No such built-in compression support is in Ext4. You might also want to consider Btrfs for your array drives, but you should be aware of the potential risks. NTFS OpenBenchmarking. Each of the tested file-systems were carried out with the default mount options in an out-of-the-box manner. Btrfs El sistema de archivos Btrfs nació como sucesor natural de EXT4, su objetivo es sustituirlo eliminando el mayor número de sus limitaciones, sobre todo lo referido al tamaño. If you want to see how Bcachefs compares to. If you omit the size parameter, a journal size based on the size of the file system is used. ext4,xfs,btrfs,zfsでベンチマークしてます。. Btrfs is slower, especially on non-SSDs, because of CoW, but has a whole lot more going on under the hood in way of features and data integrity. The inode system creates a separate table on each. brown2green. I suggest to give the arch wiki a read to get an overview what btrfs provides and where it’s limited in comparison to other solutions. For a future article will be a look at non-mainlined file-systems, including ZFS On Linux. So now I can boot up into a snapshot. - Đảm bảo dữ liệu khi thực hiện backup. Supported LBA Sizes (NSID 0x1) Id Fmt Data Metadt Rel_Perf 0 - 512 0 2 1. Because ext4 is deficient as an enterprise level fs, Red Hat has spent quite a. F2FS vs. - Bảo vệ dữ liệu. Guess it depends on the scenario. 8ではPhoronixのテストの結果ではXFSが非常に速く、Ext4が遅い。 Una vez que hemos conocido las principales características de EXT4, vamos a hablar sobre Btrfs, el que se conoce como sucesor natural del sistema de archivos EXT4. The first way is mkfs. 0 File-System Benchmarks: Btrfs vs. Recommend. ago. Now today I had a power outage on our office server and I discovered that one file on the JFS volume has been completely corrupted. In this episode of the CyberGizmo I benchmark the 4 filesystems chosen by Phoronix for his testing and use my own workloads to compare and contrast them. For reducing the size of a filesystem, there are two purported wats forward, according to xfs developers. El ext4 y xf. However, Ext3 lacks advanced file system features like extent blocking mapping, dynamic allocation inode, and defragmentation. It's got good features. A number of Phoronix readers have been asking about some fresh file-system comparisons on recent kernels. F2FS vs. I know how to maintain it even in case of horrible events. Considering that btrfs will be able to span over multiple hard drives, it's a good thing that it supports 16 times more drive space than ext4. 17現在、Ext4と比べ特にBtrfsが遅かったりはしない。SSD上の動作であればむしろ有利なくらいだ。 つまり、Ext4のほうが速く、Btrfsが遅いカーネルもある。 例を示そう。 Linux5. XFS Storage : 2019-01-07: FreeBSD ZFS vs. The SATA 3. Use whatever your distro vendor supports: on Redhat and spinoffs, use XFS+LVM (the latter gives you snapshotting capabilities today;: XFS itself will receive them in the medium term), on Suse use BTRFS. for the home lab you can use ext4 it is fast an flexible: grow and shrink are supported. This pre-dates xfsprogs 3. Ext4 is the default system for most Distros. petronasAMG77 • 1 yr. Ext4 has been around for a while and is generally more reliable and backward compatible. The first command looks like this: dd if=/dev/zero of=file-sparse bs=1 count=0 seek=2G. Reviews of EXT4, EXT3, XFS, BTRFS, and ZFS. Ext4 file systems. The NTFS support was powered by FUSE. Btrfs使用校验和来确保数据不会被破坏，另一方面，Ext4不能确保数据的完整性。 Btrfs提供了文件系统中存在的压缩算法，允许在将数据写入系统时在文件系统级进行压缩. No swap because 16GB RAM is enough for me. About Linux filesystem, I prefer Ext4 > XFS > Btrfs, it seems that Btrfs is slow for IO, and XFS. Edit: I managed to save the two NTFS HDDs with chkdsk, but the exFAT drive just didn't wanna play ball. checksum verification on each file. Both are good file systems. On the HDD the Bcachefs performance was just behind EXT4 but doing much better than Btrfs though not nearly as fast as XFS in this case. XFS has been quite rock solid for me since the Linux 3. Ext4 for Synology NAS devices, most users should pick Btrfs for the data integrity benefits that it provides. zfs not. I heard BRTFS filesystem with continuous trim and unit allocation size of 64kb are the best configs so far. A daily snapshot of Ubuntu 19. creating volumes and mounting them would need to check that option and decide on appropriate mount points. ext4 is certainly is much more stable than btrfs. Higher scores are better. There are several filesystems such as ext4, f2fs, btrfs. Btrfs vs ext4 . Find a motherboard with enough drive ports or real sata controllers to run all the drives. The XFS supports more file sizes and greater file or partition sizes. XFS is about as mainline as a non-ext filesystem gets under Linux. ZFS is faster than ext4, and is a great filesystem candidate for boot partitions! I would go with ZFS, and not look back. . Support for large file sizes - The Ext4 supports a single file size of up to 16 TiB ( Tebibytes ) whereas XFS supports a max file size of up to 8 exbibytes. Tùy chọn mặc. Small to Medium Enterprises: While ext3 suffices for businesses with modest data needs, scalability visionaries would do well considering ext4. However, XFS is amazingly fast in the insertion phase as well as the workload execution phase. Posts: 5,135. 3TB HDD formatted as NTFS for main files. Language: Format: Red Hat Training. ext4. Does it means that Btrfs is better than Ext4 now ? btrfs has already long been an excellent and stable filesystem. Either way you go, just leave EXT4 where it is, in the ground. Softwareseitig werden die Dateisysteme ext4 und Btrfs generell ab Diskstation Manager (DSM) 6. , power failure) could be acceptable. my rough draft would be to offer an advanced option for the mount points (i. What takes up space is each consecutive data change, that is why snapshots are created instantaneously. Having this opportunity I wanted to put some hard numbers to my previous observations regarding ext4 vs Btrfs performance on my T430 running Qubes OS R4. There’s very little difference between EXT4 and XFS, both in total throughput and behavior over time. The arguments about ext4 vs NTFS have been raging online for decades now. Out of curiosity I have tried BTRFS (still unstable so I can't really expect to be able to use it) and noticed that the read speed is about 150% of ext4 - while write speed is comparable. Hardwareseitig gibt es bei Btrfs jedoch Ausnahmen. Short answer: under GNU/Linux, you should use a GNU/Linux native file system, such as ext4, XFS or btrfs, as your root partition, for stability and security. Você pode então configurar a aplicação de cotas usando uma opção de montagem. Between 2T and 4T on a single disk, any of these would probably have similar performance. 2. Interestingly ZFS is amazing for. These days the system is more refined with Dalto’s Btrfs Assistant. btrfs turns off metadata duplication on a single device when /sys/block/ device /queue/rotational is zero for the single specified device. I've never had an issue with either, and currently run btrfs + luks. The chart below displays the difference in terms of hard drive space reserved for redundancy. ZFS is open source, it isn't "owned" by Oracle. While it is possible to migrate from ext4 to XFS, it. Được tích hợp vô hệ thống DSM Synology , do NAS có hiệu xuất làm việc cao trong vấn đề lưu trữ và khôi phục, Btrfs hoạt động trên NAS. With not having the time to conduct the usual kernel version vs. Btrfs vs Ext4. e. For anything with higher capability, XFS tends to be faster. FUSE-based file systems. First up was the SQLite embedded SQL database library test. If your think you don’t need btrfs style backups, or you run timeshift on ext4 then stick with it. When using btrfs with mergerfs and will warn you do not use drive multiplexers with it. For the adventurous: you can define block devices on btrfs and use ext4 on those block devices (ext4 on btrfs). at least as much as ext4 (which isn’t all that trusted by SUSE). By far, XFS can handle large data better than any other filesystem on this list and do it reliably too. 0 X. This is why XFS might be a great candidate for an SSD. That bug apart, any delayed allocation filesystem (ext4 and btrfs included) will lose a significant number or un-synched data in case of uncontrolled poweroff. The problem (which i understand is fairly common) is that performance of a single NVMe drive on zfs vs ext4 is atrocious. As modern computing gets more and more advanced, data files get larger and more. Reasons why I use LVM/ext4: I'm used to it. Die Benchmark-Testergebnisse zeigten, dass BTRFS etwas niedrigere Lese- und Schreibgeschwindigkeiten als EXT4 hatte. To be clear, I am using RAID0 with two SSDs with strip size of 256Kb. Otherwise, I don't think you'd notice the performance difference. For SSDs, F2FS really is a hands down winner still, although EXT4 and XFS are catching up, they still lose. With all of the major file-systems seeing clean-up work during the Linux 4. If you have multiple disks — and therefore parity or redundancy from which corrupted data can theoretically be recovered — EXT4 has no way of knowing that, even less using it to your. 6,861. Example 2: ZFS has licensing issues to Distribution-wide support is spotty. It is the default file system in Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7. File-systems tested on the NVMe SSD included Btrfs, EXT4, F2FS, XFS, and NTFS. BTRFS solves all the problems I had so far: supports online resizing - both extending and shrinking. EXT4 is very low-hassle, normal journaled filesystem. Ext4 is fast and rock solid, and easily recovered on a desktop machine if things go really bad. Language: Format: Language and Page Formatting Options. The server I'm working with is: The server came with a bunch of 72GB SAS drives, but I also have 500GB and 240GB 2. The main thing is to use latest Linux kernels to avoid old kernel Btrfs implementation. My current setup is /@ for the rootfs, /@home for home dir, works great. Ext4 file system is an ideal choice. Watching LearnLinuxTV's Proxmox course, he mentions that ZFS offers more features and better performance as the host OS filesystem, but also uses a lot of RAM. The space savings with zstd compression are insane, and I see virtually no performance degradation. ) XFS. Page 2 of 2. Both timeshift and borg write to it. Ext4 is the fourth version of the Ext(Extended) File System for Linux and is probably the most well-known file system for Linux out there. ZFS. BTRFS RAID1 is stable as far as I know, BTRFS RAID5 not so much. Ext4 is the default file system on most Linux distributions for a reason. EXT4 is just a file system, as NTFS is - it doesn't really do anything for a NAS and would require either hardware or software to add some flavor. Sun Microsystems originally created it as part of its Solaris operating system. XFS is very well established and changing slowly, and the same can be said for EXT4. . 8 snapshot as of last week. 5 inch SSDs, which from what I understand, should work in a SAS chassis. ZFS does have advantages for handling data corruption (due to data checksums and scrubbing) - but unless you're spreading the data between multiple disks, it will at most tell you "well, that file's corrupted, consider it gone now". But… Some different plus for BTRFS Backup is about data safety. NVMe drives formatted to 4096k. Using Btrfs, just expanding a zip file and trying to immediately enter that new expanded folder in Nautilus, I am presented with a “busy” spinning graphic as Nautilus is preparing to display the new folder contents. Tl;dr: The best filesystem for Unraid. Phoronix has a ton of reviews, Google for them. The Ext4 File System. Complementing the benchmarks from yesterday are some more results today with Bcachefs compared to EXT4, Btrfs, XFS, and F2FS with testing being done from the same Intel M. This might lead one to move to btrfs on the SMR disk. I think ext4 is _much_ faster at fsck. F2FS vs. EXT4 vs. - chống phân mảnh dữ liệu nhanh chóng. A：BTRFS系能最差，不到20 seeks/sec. XFS back then was buggy and error-prone, to say the least. BTRFS claims to offer a lot (data-loss resiliency, self-healing if RAID, checksumming of metadata and data, compression, snapshots). 2. This page is powered by a knowledgeable community that helps you make an informed decision. e. 4. I was using NTFS due to compatibility. ext4 -fyv /dev/sdXX # man btrfs-convert (read it!) # btrfs-convert /dev/sdXX. This time around, ext4 has managed. Btrfs lacks maturity and stability at the time of this writing but is more feature-rich compared to EXT4. Potential for data loss: While btrfs has features to protect against data loss, these features can be complex to configure and may not always work as intended, leading to the possibility of data loss. It lived enough, time to move on. 88. the COW which saves alot of space and increases the speed. EXT2/3/4: Extended Filesystem is by far the most popular filesystem among Linux desktop installations. I have a raid 1 setup on dual 3. Both Btrfs and ZFS offer built-in RAID support, but their implementations differ. We recommend btrfs for testing, development, and any non-critical deployments. Btrfs El sistema de archivos Btrfs nació como sucesor natural de EXT4, su objetivo es sustituirlo eliminando el mayor número de sus limitaciones, sobre todo lo referido al tamaño. LVM has snapshots. It's not "better" because better depends on your use case. Of all the niche file systems, one of the most interesting is Z File. The question is XFS vs EXT4. Without going too technical, if you want to have easy system backups so that you can revert to if an update breaks the system, then btrfs. The SATA 3. The archlinux article Solid State Drives says in the section Choice of Filesystem:. xfs/. With not having the time to conduct the usual kernel version vs. EXT4は、Linuxベースのオペレーティングシステムのメインファイルシステムです。zfs or btrfs or ext4. XFS is a robust and mature 64-bit journaling file system that supports very large files and file systems on a single host. If you do hardware RAID, with a dedicated RAID card, just do not use ZFS please, it will break your data at some point. which btw you should put in here then as well. 04 Disco Dingo was running on the Threadripper setup while using the Linux Git kernel from the mainline PPA. Difference between Ext4 vs Btrfs filesystems on Linux.